Sean ONeill's original article makes some cogent points and is obviously well informed by insiders. The main crticism is not necessarily a crticism. To discover that the 130 targets you inherited were not actually the top figures in the dugs trade sounds like a step forward in intelligence to me! Working out the true picture is a vital first step for an intelligence-led agency. The criticisms of management structures and IT systems arent exactly surprising. They could be made of any public sector organisation in the UK.
Sean's follow-up article: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3919731.ece
Which raises some important questions for debate.
Hughes' letter together with others:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article3932772.ece
and the latest piece:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3941725.ece
Enjoy the read!
16 May 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment